Why the study?
Pre-operative surgery schools lack conclusive evidence of effectiveness, and their development and delivery lack standardisation.
This consensus statement provides standardized recommendations for the definition, design, and implementation of pre-operative surgery schools to optimize peri-operative care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Establishes expert consensus on surgery school definition and recommendations; extends perioperative literature to guide standardized programs and future trials.
INTRODUCTION: Pre-operative group sessions incorporating patient education and behaviour change interventions, known as 'surgery schools', are becoming increasingly common before major elective surgery across the world. However, there is a lack of conclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgery schools, and the development and delivery of these complex interventions lacks standardisation. METHODS: In collaboration with the Perioperative Quality Initiative, we aimed to develop evidence- and expertise-based consensus statements and recommendations regarding the definition, design, content, and outcomes of surgery schools. Thirty-two international multidisciplinary experts in surgery school and pre-operative preparation attended a series of virtual meetings based on a modified Delphi methodology. A systematic review and additional targeted literature searches were used to propose statements for the definition, design, content and outcomes of surgery schools. Statements and recommendations were discussed iteratively and refined in multiple rounds, until agreement was reached. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on a definition of surgery school, as well as three statements and 18 recommendations in relation to: scope; outcomes; intervention development; delivery; inclusivity; and educational content of surgery schools. Seventeen areas were highlighted as priorities for future research. DISCUSSION: These consensus statements and recommendations are intended to help clinicians and service managers who plan to develop and implement surgery schools. They may improve the quality of those programmes and help to standardise their content. We also hope that this work will influence government strategy and policy in relation to the design, delivery and funding of peri-operative optimisation pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fecher‐Jones et al. (2025) studied Major elective surgery (n=32). Surgery schools was evaluated on Consensus statements and recommendations regarding the definition, design, content, and outcomes of surgery schools. A modified Delphi consensus process among 32 international experts yielded a definition of surgery school, 3 statements, and 18 recommendations regarding their scope, outcomes, and delivery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: