Key result
High illness acceptance was associated with a greater likelihood of high adherence to pharmacological treatment compared to low-to-moderate acceptance (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.14-2.19).
Why the study?
Does high illness acceptance improve adherence to pharmacological treatment in patients with arterial hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=602)
Does high illness acceptance improve adherence to pharmacological treatment in patients with arterial hypertension?
Odds Ratio: 1.58 (95% CI 1.14–2.19)
p-value: p=0.008
Higher illness acceptance, male sex, age >45-66 years, and receiving one-tablet polytherapy are significant determinants of better adherence to antihypertensive treatment.
Illness acceptance was associated with higher adherence in HT; leaves open whether acceptance-focused interventions improve BP control.
Background: Low adherence to hypertension (HT) management is one of the major contributors to poor blood pressure (BP) control. Approximately 40%–60% of patients with HT do not follow the prescribed treatment. The aim of the study was to analyze the relationship between selected variables and adherence to hypotensive pharmacological treatment. Besides socioclinical variables, the study focused on the role of illness acceptance. Participants and methods: The study included 602 patients with HT. Adherence and acceptance of illness were assessed using the following validated instruments: the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS). Results: The high-adherence group comprised a significantly higher percentage of patients with high illness acceptance scale scores than that of patients with low-to-moderate scores (42.4 vs 31.8%; P =0.008<0.01). The odds ratio (OR) showed that high adherence to pharmacological treatment was >1.5 times as likely to occur in the high acceptance group as in the low-to-moderate acceptance group (OR =1.58, 95% CI 1.14–2.19). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients showed statistically significant correlations between adherence and sex (men ρ =–0.101; P =0.012), age >45–66 years ( ρ =0.098; P =0.015), higher education level ( ρ =0.132; P =0.001), grade ESC of HT ( ρ =–0.037; P =0.057), receiving one-tablet polytherapy ( ρ =0.131; P =0.015), and illness acceptance ( ρ =0.090; P =0.024). Conclusion: Acceptance of illness is correlated with adherence to pharmacological treatment, and consideration should be given to more widespread assessment of illness acceptance in daily practice. Male sex, age >45–66 years, duration of illness grade ESC of HT, and receiving one-tablet polytherapy are significant determinants of adherence to pharmacological treatment in HT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jankowska‐Polańska et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=602). High illness acceptance vs. Low-to-moderate illness acceptance was evaluated on High adherence to pharmacological treatment (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.19, p=0.008). High illness acceptance was associated with a greater likelihood of high adherence to pharmacological treatment compared to low-to-moderate acceptance (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.14-2.19).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: