Key result
A 10 mm Hg increase in 24-h ambulatory pulse pressure predicted total and cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and cardiac events in the placebo group (HR 1.25 to 1.68), but this relation was attenuated by active treatment.
Why the study?
Does ambulatory pulse pressure predict adverse outcomes better than conventional pulse pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension?
Population
808 older patients (≥60 years) with isolated systolic hypertension (160 to 219/71 <95 mm Hg)
Comparison
Nitrendipine with the possible addition of… vs Matching placebos
Design
RCT, Randomized, Placebo-controlled (matching placebos)
Authors
Loading...
Ambulatory pulse pressure may refine risk stratification in older isolated systolic hypertension; extends conventional BP prognostic data from treatment trial participants.
RCT (n=808)
Placebo-controlled
Randomized
Does ambulatory pulse pressure predict adverse outcomes better than conventional pulse pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension?
Effect estimate: HR 1.25 to 1.68 (per 10 mm Hg increase in pulse pressure)
Ambulatory 24-hour pulse pressure is a superior predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to conventional pulse pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension.
Jan A. Staessen (2002) conducted an RCT in Isolated systolic hypertension (n=808). Nitrendipine (with possible addition of enalapril or hydrochlorothiazide) vs. Matching placebos was evaluated on Total and cardiovascular mortality, all cardiovascular events, stroke, and cardiac events (HR 1.25 to 1.68 (per 10 mm Hg increase in pulse pressure)). A 10 mm Hg increase in 24-h ambulatory pulse pressure predicted total and cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and cardiac events in the placebo group (HR 1.25 to 1.68), but this relation was attenuated by active treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: