Key result
The Apple Watch showed acceptable agreement with telemetry for heart rate measurement in patients with OSA and AF (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.88; 95% CI 0.85-0.91).
Why the study?
Patients with obstructive sleep apnea are at elevated risk for atrial fibrillation, and consumer wearable sensors could enable passive heart rate monitoring, but their agreement with telemetry in this population was unverified.
Does the Apple Watch provide acceptable agreement with telemetry for measuring heart rate in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=20)
Does the Apple Watch provide acceptable agreement with telemetry for measuring heart rate in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91)
The Apple Watch demonstrates acceptable agreement with standard telemetry for short-term heart rate monitoring in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at a higher risk for atrial fibrillation (AF). Consumer wearable heart rate (HR) sensors may be a means for passive HR monitoring in patients with AF. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the Apple Watch’s agreement with telemetry in measuring HR in patients with OSA in AF. METHODS Patients with OSA in AF were prospectively recruited prior to cardioversion/ablation procedures. HR was sampled every 10 seconds for 60 seconds using telemetry and an Apple Watch concomitantly. Agreement of Apple Watch with telemetry, which is the current gold-standard device for measuring HR, was assessed using mixed effects limits agreement and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient. RESULTS A total of 20 patients (mean 66 [SD 6.5] years, 85% [n=17] male) participated in this study, yielding 134 HR observations per device. Modified Bland–Altman plot revealed that the variability of the paired difference of the Apple Watch compared with telemetry increased as the magnitude of HR measurements increased. The Apple Watch produced regression-based 95% limits of agreement of 27.8 – 0.3 × average HR – 15.0 to 27.8 – 0.3 × average HR + 15.0 beats per minute (bpm) with a mean bias of 27.8 – 0.33 × average HR bpm. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91), suggesting acceptable agreement between the Apple Watch and telemetry. CONCLUSIONS In patients with OSA in AF, the Apple Watch provided acceptable agreement with HR measurements by telemetry. Further studies with larger sample populations and wider range of HR are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huynh et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Obstructive sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation (n=20). Apple Watch heart rate measurement vs. Telemetry was evaluated on Agreement of Apple Watch with telemetry in measuring heart rate (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.91). The Apple Watch showed acceptable agreement with telemetry for heart rate measurement in patients with OSA and AF (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.88; 95% CI 0.85-0.91).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: