Key result
Under-expansion (expansion ratio 69% vs 90% at 6 months, P=0.014) and smaller valve area of the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve were strongly associated with the need for reintervention.
Why the study?
Do geometrical THV measurements assessed by CT predict the need for reintervention in patients undergoing transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement?
Observational (n=20)
Do geometrical THV measurements assessed by CT predict the need for reintervention in patients undergoing transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement?
Absolute Event Rate: 69% vs 90%
p-value: p=0.014
CT-derived geometrical measurements, specifically under-expansion and smaller valve area, are strongly associated with the need for reintervention following transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement.
OBJECTIVE: Distortion of transcatheter heart valve (THV) stent shape and morphology has been shown to impact on THV function. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between geometrical CT follow-up data and consequent valve function in patients undergoing transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN THV. METHODS: All patients were enrolled in the COMPASSION trial. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was performed as part of the study protocol at 6 months and yearly thereafter following valve implantation. Prosthesis eccentricity indices, circularity ratios, and expansion ratios (ER) were calculated. Valve function and reintervention rates were correlated with MDCT findings. RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients undergoing 58 CT scans were included. Maximum Doppler gradients across the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) were significantly reduced following valve implantation (P < 0.001). Geometrical indices and maximum RVOT gradients were compared between the reintervention group (n = 4) and the nonreintervention group (n = 16). Although there was no difference in eccentricity index between the groups, ER [6 months: 90 +/- 12% vs. 69 ± 9%; P = 0.014; at 12 months: 89 ± 14 vs. 69 ± 10%; P = 0.018; at 24 months: 87 ± 14% vs. 70 ± 11%; P = 0.056] and valve area [6 months: 3.98 ± 0.54 vs. 2.86 ± 0.38 P = 0.005; at 12 months: 3.93 ± 0.56 vs. 2.86 ± 0.39 P = 0.006; 24 months: 3.78 ± 0.50 vs. 2.90 ± 0.45 P = 0.019] were lower in the reintervention group compared with the nonreintervention group at all time periods. CONCLUSION: Geometrical THV measurements as assessed by CT may predict the need for reintervention in patients undergoing transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the SAPIEN valve. Valve symmetry is maintained, however under-expansion and smaller valve area are strongly associated with the need for reintervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muller et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (n=20). Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN THV vs. Nonreintervention group was evaluated on Expansion ratio at 6 months (p=0.014). Under-expansion (expansion ratio 69% vs 90% at 6 months, P=0.014) and smaller valve area of the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve were strongly associated with the need for reintervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: