Key result
Patients with end-stage heart failure frequently experience profound psychological and spiritual distress, social isolation, and ambiguous illness trajectories that complicate advance care planning.
Why the study?
Clinical trials rarely explore the lived experience of patients, and qualitative research is needed to help clinicians better engage with patients with end-stage heart failure and their carers.
Understanding the lived experience of end-stage heart failure, including psychological distress and the need for advance care planning, can help clinicians provide more personalized and empathetic care.
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials rarely explore the patient's lived experience. Qualitative research bridges the gap between evidence-based medicine and the patient's journey. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to explore key aspects of the lived experience of patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF). This will allow clinicians to better engage with patients and carers faced with this condition. DISCUSSION: Psychological and spiritual distress are common in ESHF. Patients with ESHF often feel socially isolated. Inadequate communication from clinical staff is a common negative experience for patients to which they frequently resign themselves. The ambiguous illness trajectory in advanced heart failure makes both general practitioners and cardiologists uncomfortable initiating advance care planning and less sure of their roles in these discussions. Patients have spiritual concerns that they reportedly feel awkward raising during consultation. Attention to these concerns will help build rapport and provide more personalised care for patients with ESHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurgenci et al. (2022) conducted a review in End-stage heart failure. Patients with end-stage heart failure frequently experience profound psychological and spiritual distress, social isolation, and ambiguous illness trajectories that complicate advance care planning.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: