The use of oxygen-enriched air, instead of ambient air, can significantly improve the energy efficiency of combustion processes and reduce the cost of CO 2 capture from flue gases throughout manufacturing industries. This study examines the overall energy savings and economic benefits that can be obtained using oxygen-enriched combustion based on novel membranes and processes to produce oxygen-enriched air. Membrane processes using low-pressure air as a countercurrent sweep in the permeate were used to minimize the energy cost of producing oxygen-enriched air. High-performance thin film composite membranes based on a series of perfluoropolymers and bench-scale spiral-wound modules were prepared, and showed oxygen permeance as high as 1200 gpu (1 gpu = 10 –6 cm 3 (STP)/cm 2 ·s·cmHg) combined with O 2 /N 2 selectivity of 3.0. The membrane-based oxygen-enriched combustion processes show good energy savings (defined as the fuel savings less the energy consumption of producing oxygen-enriched air) and economic benefits (defined as the value of fuel saved less the operating cost of producing oxygen-enriched air), especially at flue gas temperatures higher than 1090 °C (or 2000 °F). For example, at a flue gas temperature of 1649 °C (or 3000 °F), membrane-based oxygen-enriched combustion shows a net energy savings of 35% and a net economic benefit of 29%, compared to the combustion process with air. The effect of oxygen-enriched air on NO x emissions in a natural gas furnace was also experimentally investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: