Key result
Undergraduate paramedic students demonstrated inaccuracies in ECG interpretation, deviating from the J-point by a mean of 0.55 mm horizontally (95% CI 0.29-0.81) and -0.18 mm vertically.
Why the study?
Can undergraduate paramedic students accurately identify ECG ST-segment elevation and J-Point location?
Cross-Sectional (n=148)
Can undergraduate paramedic students accurately identify ECG ST-segment elevation and J-Point location?
Mean Difference: 0.55 (95% CI 0.29–0.81)
Undergraduate paramedic students struggle with accurate measurement of ST-segments and precise location of J-Points, highlighting a need for improved educational programs.
Variable accuracy in J-point/ST-segment identification among paramedic students; extends need for targeted ECG training in curricula.
INTRODUCTION: Correct identification of the J-Point and ST-segment on an electrocardiograph (ECG) is an important clinical skill for paramedics working in acute healthcare settings. The skill of ECG analysis and interpretation is known to be challenging to learn and often is a difficult concept to teach. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to determine if undergraduate paramedic students could accurately identify ECG ST-segment elevation and J-Point location. METHODS: A convenience sample of undergraduate paramedic students (n = 148) was provided with four enlarged ECGs (ECG1-4) that illustrated different levels, patterns, and characteristics of ST-segment elevation. Participants were asked to identify whether ST-elevation was present, and if so, height in millimeters (mm) and the correct location of the J-Point. RESULTS: There were significant variations in students' accuracy with both J-Point and ST-segment determination. Eleven (10%) students correctly identified the ST-segment being present in all ECGs. Also, ECG 2 reflected 6 mm of ST-elevation; however, only one student correctly identified this. Overall the students were 0.55 mm (95% CI = 0.29-0.81 mm, range = -6.5-5.8 mm) from the J-point on the horizontal and -0.18 mm (95% CI = -0.31-0.04 mm, range = -2.8-2.3 mm) on the vertical axis. CONCLUSIONS: Undergraduate paramedic students recognize ST-segment elevation. However, inaccuracies occurred with measurements of ST-segment and precise location of J-Points. Errors in ECG analysis may reflect weaknesses in teaching this skill. Consideration should be given to the design of an educational program that can reliably improve performance of this skill.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in ECG interpretation skills (n=148). ECG interpretation was evaluated on Accuracy of J-Point location on horizontal axis (Mean deviation 0.55 mm, 95% CI 0.29-0.81). Undergraduate paramedic students demonstrated inaccuracies in ECG interpretation, deviating from the J-point by a mean of 0.55 mm horizontally (95% CI 0.29-0.81) and -0.18 mm vertically.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: