Why the study?
Are clinicians ordering cardiac biomarkers for suspected ACS in accordance with recent guidelines recommending high-sensitivity cardiac troponin alone?
Observational (n=193)
No
Are clinicians ordering cardiac biomarkers for suspected ACS in accordance with recent guidelines recommending high-sensitivity cardiac troponin alone?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The vast majority of cardiac biomarker requests for suspected ACS in this setting included unnecessary CK-MB testing, highlighting a significant gap between clinical practice and current guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a frequent presenting symptom and is a diagnostic challenge. Recent recommendations state that high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays are the only biochemical test required in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and that other biomarkers such as myoglobin or creatine kinase (CK)-MB isoform are not indicated. OBJECTIVE: To establish whether clinician ordering in the setting of suspected ACS was in keeping with recent recommendations. METHODS: A prospective audit was undertaken of all requests for cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and CK-MB received at a large tertiary hospital in Durban, South Africa, during a 20-day period in December 2012. RESULTS: A total of 193 cardiac marker requests were received: 12 (6.2%) requests were for cTnI alone; 8 (4.1%) were for CK-MB alone; and the remaining 173 (89.7%) were for both cTnI and CK-MB. Therefore, a total of 181 (93.8%) incorrect requests were received during this period. A total of 103 (53.4%) patients had values below the cut-off point of 40 ng/l for cTnI, i.e. ACS was ruled out. Of these, 15 had CK-MB values above the reference interval. A total of 12 (6.2%) patients had cTnI values > 500 ng/l, i.e. ACS was ruled in; 33.3% of this group had normal CK-MB values. CONCLUSION: Ordering patterns in the setting of ACS did not reflect current recommendations and were wasteful and potentially dangerous.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellbhudder et al. (2014) conducted an observational in suspected acute coronary syndrome (n=193). Cardiac injury marker ordering was evaluated on Incorrect requests (not in keeping with recent recommendations). In a prospective audit of 193 cardiac marker requests for suspected ACS, 93.8% were incorrect, indicating that clinician ordering patterns did not reflect current recommendations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: