Key result
Abciximab did not improve 1-year mortality compared with placebo in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (8.2% vs 7.8%; HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.86-1.29 for 24-hour infusion).
Why the study?
Does abciximab reduce 1-year mortality in patients with NSTE-ACS who are not scheduled for early coronary intervention?
Population
7,800 patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation documented by either elevated cardiac…
Comparison
Abciximab bolus followed by either a 24-hour… vs Matching placebo.
Design
RCT, Randomized to abciximab bolus and 24-hour infusion, abciximab bolus and…
Follow-up
1 year
Authors
Loading...
Abciximab confers no benefit in medically managed NSTE-ACS; leaves open optimal GP IIb/IIIa use in this population.
RCT (n=7,800)
Placebo-controlled
Randomized
Does abciximab reduce 1-year mortality in patients with NSTE-ACS who are not scheduled for early coronary intervention?
Hazard Ratio: 1.1 (95% CI 0.86–1.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.2% vs 7.8%
In patients with NSTE-ACS managed medically without early revascularization, abciximab does not improve 1-year survival and is associated with excess mortality in subgroups with negative troponin or elevated CRP.
Ottervanger et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation (n=7,800). Abciximab vs. Matching placebo was evaluated on 1-year mortality (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.86-1.29). Abciximab did not improve 1-year mortality compared with placebo in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (8.2% vs 7.8%; HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.86-1.29 for 24-hour infusion).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: