Key result
Atrial pacing at different heart rates showed that Bazett's formula had the highest QTc variability (F=175.9), while Hodges and Karjalainen-Nomogram showed the least dependence (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Which QTc correction formula provides the least heart rate dependence in patients with normal or prolonged repolarization undergoing atrial pacing?
Population
123 dual-chamber device recipients with baseline normal or prolonged QT interval, preserved intrinsic…
Comparison
Atrial pacing at 60, 80, and 100 beats per… vs Baseline heart rate and comparison among the…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
QTc formulas vary in heart rate dependence among device patients; leaves open optimal method for clinical use.
Which QTc correction formula provides the least heart rate dependence in patients with normal or prolonged repolarization undergoing atrial pacing?
p-value: p=<0.05
The Hodges and Karjalainen-Nomogram formulae provide the least heart rate-dependent QTc correction, whereas the widely used Bazett's formula is the most heart rate-dependent.
Chiladakis et al. (2009) studied Normal or prolonged repolarization (n=123). Atrial pacing at 60, 80, and 100 beats per minute vs. Baseline (52 +/- 3 beats per minute) was evaluated on QTc variability across heart rate stages (p=<0.05). Atrial pacing at different heart rates showed that Bazett's formula had the highest QTc variability (F=175.9), while Hodges and Karjalainen-Nomogram showed the least dependence (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: