Key result
Discussing a negative personal experience elicited the greatest systolic and diastolic blood pressure reactivity among individuals high in hostility, for both support recipients and providers.
Why the study?
Does cynical hostility increase cardiovascular reactivity during stressful social support interactions in healthy adults?
RCT (n=216)
Randomly assigned
Does cynical hostility increase cardiovascular reactivity during stressful social support interactions in healthy adults?
High cynical hostility undermines the cardiovascular benefits of social support during stressful interactions, leading to heightened blood pressure reactivity for both support providers and recipients.
Hypothesis-generating for hostility blunting social support benefits on CVR; prospective trials needed before clinical consideration.
BACKGROUND: Both social support and hostility have been reliably associated with important health outcomes including coronary heart disease (CHD). One potential pathway by which these variables may influence CHD is via their impact on cardiovascular reactivity (CVR). Although social support has been generally associated with beneficial effects on cardiovascular functioning, the cynicism and mistrust among hostile individuals may prevent them from benefiting from the support process during times of stress. PURPOSE AND METHOD: The present study examined if level of hostility influenced CVR when discussing positive or negative personal experiences with a friend. To test this, healthy males and females and their same-sex friend were recruited (N = 216) and randomly assigned to discuss either a positive or negative (stressful) personal experience while cardiovascular measures were recorded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed the greatest systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure reactivity among individuals high in hostility when discussing a negative experience. These results suggest that hostility may interfere with the benefits from support transactions during stress. Likewise, this association between hostility and reactivity was apparent for both support recipients and support providers, suggesting that hostility could undermine the health benefits of both aspects of support transactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holt‐Lunstad et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=216). Discussing a negative (stressful) personal experience vs. Discussing a positive personal experience was evaluated on Cardiovascular reactivity (systolic and diastolic blood pressure). Discussing a negative personal experience elicited the greatest systolic and diastolic blood pressure reactivity among individuals high in hostility, for both support recipients and providers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: