Key result
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) significantly predicted complicated appendicitis in children, with NLR yielding an AUC of 0.776 and PLR an AUC of 0.694.
Why the study?
Predicting the risk of perforation in acute appendicitis could direct timely management and reduce morbidity, motivating an investigation into PLR and NLR for distinguishing uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in children.
Do Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) predict the severity of acute appendicitis in children?
Cohort (n=701)
No
Do Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) predict the severity of acute appendicitis in children?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.776 (95% CI 0.730-0.822)
p-value: p=<0.001
NLR and PLR are reliable, synergistic markers for predicting complicated appendicitis in children, which can help guide clinical decision-making and non-operative management.
May support risk stratification for complicated appendicitis in children; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Introduction The ability to predict risk of perforation in acute appendicitis (AA) could direct timely management and reduce morbidity. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are surrogate severity markers in infections. This study investigates the use of PLR and NLR as a marker for distinguishing uncomplicated (UA) and complicated appendicitis (CA) in children. Materials and methods This retrospective single-center study collected data between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. Children between five and 17 years of age with histologically confirmed appendicitis were included. Cut-off values for NLR and PLR were determined by employing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with sensitivity and specificity in addition to regression analysis. Results A total of 701 patients were included with a median age of 13 years. Out of which 52% of the cohort was female. The difference between the NLR and PLR ratios between UA and CA was significant (p=0.05, Kruskal-Wallis). For UA, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and cut-off for NLR and PLR were 0.741, 3.80 with 95% CI of 0.701-0.781 and 0.660, 149.25 with 95% CI of 0.618-0.703, respectively. In CA, using NLR and PLR, AUC and cut-off were 0.776, 8.86 with 95%CI of 0.730-0.822 and 0.694, 193.67 with 95%CI of 0.634-0.755, respectively. All were significant with p<0.001. Conclusions NLR and PLR are reliable, synergistic markers predicting complicated appendicitis which can guide non-operative management in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayeni et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute appendicitis (n=701). Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) vs. Uncomplicated appendicitis was evaluated on Prediction of complicated appendicitis using NLR (Area Under the ROC Curve) (AUC 0.776, 95% CI 0.730-0.822, p=<0.001). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) significantly predicted complicated appendicitis in children, with NLR yielding an AUC of 0.776 and PLR an AUC of 0.694.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: