Key result
Surgical treatment was associated with significantly improved overall survival in patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma compared to no surgery (HR 0.603), alongside younger age, white race, and localized tumor stage.
Why the study?
Due to the rarity of pelvic Ewing sarcoma and limited data, its prognostic factors remain controversial.
Does surgery improve overall survival in patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma?
Cohort (n=267)
Yes
Does surgery improve overall survival in patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma?
Hazard Ratio: 0.603 (95% CI 0.381–0.953)
Absolute Event Rate: 66.7% vs 42.5%
p-value: p=0.030
Age, race, tumor stage, and surgery are independent prognostic factors for overall survival in pelvic Ewing sarcoma, which can be accurately predicted using a novel nomogram.
BACKGROUND: The pelvis is one of the primary sites of Ewing sarcoma (ES) and is associated with poorer prognoses than the extremities. Due to the rarity of this disease and limited data available, the prognostic factors of pelvic ES remain controversial. Thus, this study aimed to identify independent prognostic factors, and develop a nomogram for predicting survival rates in patients with pelvic ES. METHODS: Using data provided by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, variables including age, sex, race, tumor size, tumor stage, surgery, and radiotherapy were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Based on the results of multivariate analyses, a nomogram was built to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with pelvic ES. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by the concordance index (C-index). RESULTS: A total of 267 cases diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients who were younger, white, had a localized tumor stage, or underwent surgery were associated with improved prognoses, while no significant differences were observed in OS based on sex, tumor size, or radiotherapy. A nomogram was developed and the C-index was 0.728, indicating adequate performance for survival prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Age, race, tumor stage, and surgery were identified as independent prognostic factors for the OS of pelvic ES. The nomogram developed in this study can individually predict 3- and 5-year OS in patients with pelvic ES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Pelvic Ewing sarcoma (n=267). Surgery vs. No surgery was evaluated on Overall survival (HR 0.603, 95% CI 0.381-0.953, p=0.030). Surgical treatment was associated with significantly improved overall survival in patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma compared to no surgery (HR 0.603), alongside younger age, white race, and localized tumor stage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: