Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using thermoluminescence (TL) technique (multiple aliquot regeneration method), we dated White Pumice tephra (WP), an unconsolidated tephra on Middle Pleistocene (MIS 7) marine terrace deposits at the Kamikita plain, Aomori Prefecture. We collected 6 and 10 samples from WP on outcrops at Kacchi and Shichihyaku, respectively for evaluation of chemical leaching. Concentration of radiometric elements (U, Th and K2O) was measured for all 16 samples. Among them, five samples were selected for TL age determination. The TL ages of three samples (187±29ka, 230±23ka and 229±38ka, weighted mean : 216±15ka) well coincide with a reported age of WP (MIS 7b ; 205-210ka), correlated with δ18O stratigraphy of deep-sea sediments. The TL ages of other two samples (165±28ka and 265±33ka) are beyond the error range to 205-210ka at mid MIS 7. The chemistry of former three samples falls in the concentrated zone of U-K2O and Th-K2O diagram. Other two samples were plotted far from concentrated zone of the same diagram. For TL age determination of unconsolidated tephra, annual dose evaluation through simple screening of chemical character is critical to obtain reasonable results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chuenpee et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: