Key result
Anticoagulation is not superior to antiplatelet treatment for patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease, who face a 12 to 14% risk of subsequent stroke over 2 years despite antithrombotics.
This consensus review highlights the high recurrent stroke risk in intracranial atherosclerosis and notes that anticoagulation is not superior to antiplatelets, while aggressive risk factor management and potentially stenting offer therapeutic options.
High recurrent stroke risk in symptomatic intracranial stenosis warrants aggressive secondary prevention; extends epidemiological foundation for targeted RCTs.
The consensus conference on intracranial atherosclerosis provides a comprehensive review of the existing literature relevant to the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis, and identifies principles of management and research priorities. Patients who have suffered a stroke or transient ischemic attack attributed to stenosis (50-99%) of a major intracranial artery face a 12 to 14% risk for subsequent stroke during the 2-year period after the initial ischemic event, despite treatment with antithrombotic medications. The annual risk for subsequent stroke may exceed 20% in high-risk groups. In patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease, short-term and long-term anticoagulation is not superior to antiplatelet treatment. Overall, the subgroup analyses from randomized trials provide evidence about benefit of aggressive atherogenic risk factor management. Intracranial angioplasty with or without stent placement has evolved as a therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease, particularly those with high-grade stenosis with recurrent ischemic symptoms, medication failure, or both. A multicenter randomized trial is currently under way to compare stent placement with intense medical management for patients with high-grade symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qureshi et al. (2009) conducted a review in Intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet treatment was evaluated. Anticoagulation is not superior to antiplatelet treatment for patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease, who face a 12 to 14% risk of subsequent stroke over 2 years despite antithrombotics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: