Key result
An Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery program showed a trend toward better pain scores and decreased opioid consumption compared with a pre-implementation cohort, without affecting length of stay.
Why the study?
Does an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery (ERSS) program improve pain scores and reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic tumors?
Cohort (n=97)
No
Does an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery (ERSS) program improve pain scores and reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic tumors?
An Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery program is feasible and may improve perioperative pain control and reduce opioid consumption in oncological spine surgery patients.
ERAS in spine surgery may speed recovery; leaves open confirmation via prospective RCTs before practice change.
OBJECTIVE Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs follow a multimodal, multidisciplinary perioperative care approach that combines evidence-based perioperative strategies to accelerate the functional recovery process and improve surgical outcomes. Despite increasing evidence that supports the use of ERAS programs in gastrointestinal and pelvic surgery, data regarding the development of ERAS programs in spine surgery are scarce. To evaluate the impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery (ERSS) program in a US academic cancer center, the authors introduced such a program and hypothesized that ERSS would have a significant influence on meaningful clinical measures of postoperative recovery, such as pain management, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and complications. METHODS A multimodal, multidisciplinary, continuously evolving team approach was used to develop an ERAS program for all patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic tumors at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from April 2015 through September 2016. This study describes the introduction of that ERSS program and compares 41 patients who participated in ERSS with a retrospective cohort of 56 patients who underwent surgery before implementation of the program. The primary objectives were to assess the effect of an ERSS program on immediate postoperative pain scores and in-hospital opioid consumption. The secondary objectives included assessing the effect of ERSS on postoperative in-hospital LOS, 30-day readmission rates, and 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS The ERSS group showed a trend toward better pain scores and decreased opioid consumption compared with the pre-ERSS group. There were no significant differences in LOS, 30-day readmission rate, or 30-day complication rate observed between the two groups. RESULTS An ERSS program is feasible and potentially effective on perioperative pain control and opioid consumption, and can expedite recovery in oncological spine surgery patients. Larger-scale research on well-defined postoperative recovery outcomes is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grasu et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Metastatic spinal tumors requiring surgery (n=97). Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery (ERSS) program vs. Standard care (pre-ERSS retrospective cohort) was evaluated on Immediate postoperative pain scores and in-hospital opioid consumption. An Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery program showed a trend toward better pain scores and decreased opioid consumption compared with a pre-implementation cohort, without affecting length of stay.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: