Key result
The Mayo Score consistently predicted the yield of genetic testing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ranging from 6% for a score of -1 to 100% for a score of 5.
Why the study?
Does the Mayo Score accurately predict the yield of genetic testing using next-generation sequencing in adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=336)
No
Does the Mayo Score accurately predict the yield of genetic testing using next-generation sequencing in adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
The Mayo Score effectively predicts the yield of genetic testing in HCM patients even when using expanded next-generation sequencing panels, though the overall yield remains relatively low (21%) under stringent ACMG guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mayo Score stratifies NGS genetic yield in HCM; confirms predictive value for counseling but requires prospective trials before routine adoption.
INTRODUCTION: The yield of genetic testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is variable. The Mayo HCM Genotype Predictor score (Mayo Score) provides the pre-test probability of a positive HCM genetic test. In the original cohort of Mayo Score patients, only 9 HCM-associated myofilament genes were evaluated. The aim of this study was to validate the Mayo Score in the national HCM cohort and assess the yield of genetic testing using next generation sequencing (NGS) evaluating up to 229 genes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 336 consecutive unrelated HCM patients (41% women, mean age: 53 ±15 years). We performed NGS-based genomic testing with classification of identified variants according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. NGS findings were compared with the Mayo Score (ranging from -1 to 5) based on clinical and echocardiographic variables. RESULTS: We identified 72 variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic in 70 (21%) HCM patients. One patient with the highest Mayo Score of 5 had a pathogenic mutation (100% yield). Patients with a Mayo Score of 4 had a pathogenic mutation in 71% of cases. Patients with a Mayo Score of 3 or 2 had a pathogenic mutation in 50 and 35% of cases, respectively. The yield of genetic testing in patients with a Mayo Score of -1 to 1 was low (6-21%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall yield of genetic testing using NGS evaluating up to 229 genes was low. The yield of genetic testing was consistently predicted with Mayo Score values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonaventura et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=336). Mayo HCM Genotype Predictor score was evaluated on Yield of genetic testing (identification of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants). The Mayo Score consistently predicted the yield of genetic testing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ranging from 6% for a score of -1 to 100% for a score of 5.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: