Key result
Ivabradine significantly decreased the incidence of atrial fibrillation in transgenic mice (16.7% vs 41.2%; P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does ivabradine reduce the incidence of AF and reverse electrophysiological remodeling in transgenic AF mice?
Does ivabradine reduce the incidence of AF and reverse electrophysiological remodeling in transgenic AF mice?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.7% vs 41.2%
p-value: p=<0.01
In a transgenic mouse model of AF, long-term ivabradine reduced AF incidence and reversed electrophysiological remodeling by attenuating If gain-of-function.
Animal data on long-term ivabradine and HCN channels remain hypothesis-generating; clinical relevance requires prospective human studies.
Introduction Recent studies have demonstrated that ivabradine (IVA), is a selective inhibitor of funny current (If) and exerts antiarrhythmic effects in the settings of various diseases such as heart failure and myocardial ischemia. However, little is known regarding the effects of long‐term IVA treatment on I f current and hyperpolarization‐activated cyclic nucleotide gated (HCN) channel overexpression. Methods and Results We investigated both the I f current and HCN channel expression in wild‐type (WT) mice and transgenic (TG) atrial fibrillation (AF) mice (heart‐specific overexpressing of (pro) renin receptor TG mice) and examined the effects of IVA on the I f current and HCN channel expression, and whether those effects were sufficient to prevent an AF episode. Compared with WT mice, the I f current density (at −170 mV: TG, −39.6 ± 4.6 pA/pF; WT, −26.9 ± 3.0 pA/pF; P < 0.001) and activation kinetics ( V 1/2 : TG, −109.45 ± 1.35 mV; WT, −128.20 ± 1.65 mV), as well as HCN2 and HCN4 messenger RNA expression and HCN4 protein expression were significantly increased in the atrial myocytes of TG mice. After 4 months of IVA treatment (7 mg/kg per day orally) the effects of IVA on TG AF mice were accompanied by the inhibition of upregulation of HCN2 and HCN4 protein expression in atrial tissue, and then resulted in a uniform I f loss of function. Furthermore, we observed that ivabradine significantly decreased the incidence of AF in the TG mice (41.2% in TG mice, 16.7% in TG + IVA mice; P < 0.01). Conclusion IVA reduced the incidence of AF in mice, and the antiarrhythmic effects of IVA are not limited to heart rate reduction, as they partially counteract HCN overexpression and reverse electrophysiological cardiac remodeling by attenuating I f gain‐of‐function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) studied Atrial fibrillation. Ivabradine vs. Transgenic mice without ivabradine was evaluated on Incidence of atrial fibrillation (p=<0.01). Ivabradine significantly decreased the incidence of atrial fibrillation in transgenic mice (16.7% vs 41.2%; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: