Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates Sec62's role in inserting proteins at the endoplasmic reticulum, suggesting a new mechanism.
Nascent chains are known to be targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane either by a signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent co-translational or by an SRP-independent post-translational translocation route depending on signal sequences. Using a set of model and cellular proteins carrying an N-terminal signal anchor sequence of controlled hydrophobicity and yeast mutant strains defective in SRP or Sec62 function, the hydrophobicity-dependent targeting efficiency and targeting pathway preference were systematically evaluated. Our results suggest that an SRP-dependent co-translational and an SRP-independent post-translational translocation are not mutually exclusive for signal anchor proteins and that moderately hydrophobic ones require both SRP and Sec62 for proper targeting and translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum. Further, defect in Sec62 selectively reduced signal sequences inserted in an N in -C out (type II) membrane topology, implying an undiscovered role of Sec62 in regulating the orientation of the signal sequence in an early stage of translocation. Background: Sec62 is an essential component of the post-translational translocation machinery in the ER. Results: Translocation of moderately hydrophobic signal anchor proteins is decreased in Sec62-defective yeast cells. Conclusion: Sec62 mediates membrane insertion of signal anchor proteins in the N in -C out membrane orientation. Significance: Sec62 plays a role in regulating membrane topogenesis of moderately hydrophobic signal anchor proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reithinger et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: