Key result
The Rheos Baroreflex Hypertension Therapy System is a new implantable device for treating resistant hypertension, with clinical trials currently ongoing in Europe and the United States.
Why the study?
Does the Rheos Baroreflex Hypertension Therapy System reduce arterial pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension?
Does the Rheos Baroreflex Hypertension Therapy System reduce arterial pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension?
The Rheos Baroreflex Hypertension Therapy System is an investigational implantable device that activates the carotid baroreflex to treat resistant hypertension, with clinical trials currently ongoing.
May offer a device-based option for resistant hypertension; leaves open questions on long-term efficacy and safety.
Hypertension is a highly prevalent disorder in the United States. Of particular concern is resistant hypertension, which by definition is hypertension that cannot be adequately treated by conventional 3-drug regimens. The Rheos Baroreflex Hypertension Therapy System is a new implantable device that can treat patients with hypertension resistant to multidrug therapy, by activating the carotid baroreflex through electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus wall. Recent studies in both normotensive and hypertensive canine models have demonstrated sustained and clinically relevant reductions in arterial pressure and sympathetic activity with prolonged baroreflex activation. Clinical trials designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this therapy in patients with treatment resistant hypertension, are now ongoing in both Europe and the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2011) conducted a review in Resistant hypertension. Rheos Baroreflex Hypertension Therapy System was evaluated. The Rheos Baroreflex Hypertension Therapy System is a new implantable device for treating resistant hypertension, with clinical trials currently ongoing in Europe and the United States.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: