Key result
Machine learning algorithms, particularly the decision tree method, accurately predicted unexpected hospital mortality in surgical intensive care unit patients with an AUC of 0.96.
Why the study?
Predicting in-hospital prognosis is critical, but accurately predicting mortality in critically ill patients during specific periods remains challenging.
Can machine learning algorithms accurately predict unexpected postoperative mortality in surgical intensive care unit patients?
Observational (n=1,352)
No
Can machine learning algorithms accurately predict unexpected postoperative mortality in surgical intensive care unit patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.96
Machine learning algorithms, particularly decision trees, can accurately predict unexpected postoperative mortality in SICU patients using clinical variables.
ML may aid SICU mortality prediction; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objective: Predicting prognosis of in-hospital patients is critical. However, it is challenging to accurately predict the life and death of certain patients at certain period. To determine whether machine learning algorithms could predict in-hospital death of critically ill patients with considerable accuracy and identify factors contributing to the prediction power. Materials and Methods: Using medical data of 1,384 patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of our institution, we investigated whether machine learning algorithms could predict in-hospital death using demographic, laboratory, and other disease-related variables, and compared predictions using three different algorithmic methods. The outcome measurement was the incidence of unexpected postoperative mortality which was defined as mortality without pre-existing not-for-resuscitation order that occurred within 30 days of the surgery or within the same hospital stay as the surgery. Results: Machine learning algorithms trained with 43 variables successfully classified dead and live patients with very high accuracy. Most notably, the decision tree showed the higher classification results (Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve, AUC = 0.96) than the neural network classifier (AUC = 0.80). Further analysis provided the insight that serum albumin concentration, total prenatal nutritional intake, and peak dose of dopamine drug played an important role in predicting the mortality of SICU patients. Conclusion: Our results suggest that machine learning algorithms, especially the decision tree method, can provide information on structured and explainable decision flow and accurately predict hospital mortality in SICU hospitalized patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yun et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Critically ill patients admitted to Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) after major abdominal surgeries (n=1,352). Machine learning algorithms (Decision Tree, Neural Network, Naive Bayes) vs. Comparison between different algorithms was evaluated on Unexpected postoperative mortality within 30 days of surgery or within the same hospital stay (AUC 0.96). Machine learning algorithms, particularly the decision tree method, accurately predicted unexpected hospital mortality in surgical intensive care unit patients with an AUC of 0.96.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: