Introduction Culture is the gold-standard diagnosis for Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs). However, most hospitals in poor-resource countries lack adequately equipped laboratories and relevant expertise to perform culture and therefore heavily rely on dipstick tests as an alternative diagnostic method for UTIs. Research gap In many Kenyan hospitals, routine evaluations are rarely done to assess the reliability of popular screening tests such as the dipstick test. As such, there is a high risk of misdiagnosis emanating from inappropriate or insufficient use of proxy screening tests over the goal standards. As a result, this may lead to misuse, under-use, or over-use of antimicrobials and treatment failure. Aim The present study sought to assess the reliability of the urine dipstick test as a proxy for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in selected Kenyan hospitals. Results Using a cross-sectional hospital-based approach, the present study evaluated the performance of urine dipstick test in UTI diagnosis using culture as the gold standard. A UTI prevalence of 54.1% was found using culture. This was lower than the 66.4% recorded by the dipstick test. Estimated UTI prevalence by Nitrate test, RBCs, and Leukocyte's esterase (L.E) was 11.9%, 28.1 %, and 46%, which were lower than the observed. The nitrate test had a sensitivity of 19.8%, which was lower than 32.9%, 65.5%, and 66.2% by RBCs, all dipstick parameters, and L.E, respectively. Nitrate test (97.4%) and RBCs (77.6%) had a better specificity compared to L.E (56.5%) and all dipstick parameters combined (68.3%). Conclusion The prevalence discrepancies from the observed and low sensitivity and Specificity imply dipstick test inadequacy for accurate UTI diagnosis. The finding also demonstrates the need for urine culture for accurate UTI diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maina et al. (2022) studied this question.