Key result
Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists provide greatest benefit as adjunctive therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intra-coronary thrombosis, particularly with heparin.
Parenteral GP IIb-IIIa antagonists are most beneficial as adjunctive therapy during PCI for patients with intra-coronary thrombosis or those in transition requiring emergent PCI.
Supports selective GP IIb-IIIa use in thrombotic PCI; leaves open need for modern RCTs.
Glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonists inhibit the aggregation of activated platelets. Three agents are approved for clinical use. In this review, the characteristics of each agent, their pharmacodynamic profile, results in pivotal clinical trials and the associated clinical implications are discussed. GP IIb-IIIa antagonists have greatest benefit when used as adjunctive therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when the patient has intra-coronary thrombosis. These agents appear to provide greatest benefit when used in combination with heparin. The clinical niche for parenteral GP IIb-IIIa antagonists is evolving. The rapid onset and offset of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists plus dosing designed to inhibit extensively platelet aggregation differentiates them from oral agents. The contemporary niche appears to include patients in transition, such as individuals requiring emergent PCI before oral agents are fully active and for unstable patients requiring transport to PCI centres, particularly in patients likely to have intracoronary thrombus. Subsequent studies should evaluate the optimal duration of therapy with GP IIb-IIIa antagonists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David J. Schneider (2010) conducted a review in percutaneous coronary intervention. Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists was evaluated. Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists provide greatest benefit as adjunctive therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intra-coronary thrombosis, particularly with heparin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: