Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A conceptual model based on the assumption that soil structure evolves from a uniform random fragmentation process is proposed to define the water retention function. The fragmentation process determines the particle size distribution of the soil. The transformation of particles volumes into pore volumes via a power function and the adoption of the capillarity equation lead to an expression for the water retention curve. This expression presents two fitting parameters only. The proposed model is tested on water retention data sets of 12 soils representing a wide range of soil textures, from sand to clay. The agreement between the fitted curves and the measured data is very good. The performances of the model are also compared with those of the two‐parameter models of van Genuchten 1980 and Russo 1988 for the water retention function. In general, the proposed model exhibits increased flexibility and improves the fit at both the high and the low water contents range.
Assouline et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: