Key result
Transoesophageal echocardiography measures of systolic function did not differ significantly from pressure-volume loop analysis across loading conditions, whereas dP/dt varied significantly (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does transoesophageal echocardiography accurately assess systolic function compared to load-independent pressure-volume loop analysis across different loading conditions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Observational (n=10)
Does transoesophageal echocardiography accurately assess systolic function compared to load-independent pressure-volume loop analysis across different loading conditions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Transoesophageal echocardiography adequately and validly assesses systolic function across varying loading conditions during coronary artery bypass surgery when compared to invasive pressure-volume loop analysis.
Supports TEE for systolic assessment in CABG; hypothesis-generating, should not yet change practice.
Transoesophageal echocardiography measures of systolic left ventricular function obtained during coronary artery bypass surgery are heavily influenced by alterations in loading conditions. No validation of these measurements against load independent indices obtained by pressure-volume loop analysis has been undertaken in humans. Ten patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery underwent simultaneous transoesophageal echocardiography and pressure-volume loop analysis of cardiac function at different loading conditions (reduced preload, increased afterload and atrial pacing). Fractional area change, afterload corrected fractional area change, and lateral basal wall peak systolic myocardial velocity, along with dP/dt, were compared to the preload recruitable stroke work relationship. There were no significant differences between the echocardiography measures when compared to the preload recruitable stroke work relationship; however, dP/dt varied significantly across loading conditions (p<0.001). Transoesophageal echocardiography adequately assesses systolic function across loading conditions commonly seen during coronary artery bypass surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Royse et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Coronary artery bypass surgery (n=10). Transoesophageal echocardiography vs. Pressure-volume loop analysis was evaluated on Comparison of echocardiography measures to the preload recruitable stroke work relationship. Transoesophageal echocardiography measures of systolic function did not differ significantly from pressure-volume loop analysis across loading conditions, whereas dP/dt varied significantly (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: