Key result
Dominant frequency values from noncontact unipolar electrograms correlated well with contact unipolar signals throughout the atria in 94% of mapping sites (r = 0.87, P < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does noncontact mapping accurately reflect the frequency spectra of contact unipolar electrograms during atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=12)
Does noncontact mapping accurately reflect the frequency spectra of contact unipolar electrograms during atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: r = 0.87
p-value: p=<0.001
Noncontact mapping provides accurate dominant frequency measurements during atrial fibrillation compared to contact mapping, independent of the distance to the array center.
Noncontact mapping may support dominant frequency assessment in AF; leaves open whether it improves ablation outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Noncontact mapping (NCM) can record virtual unipolar electrograms (Egs) from multiple sites simultaneously; therefore, it has the potential to perform simultaneous frequency mapping during atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to validate the frequency spectra of the noncontact unipolar Egs in both atria. METHODS: This study enrolled 12 patients (age = 61 +/- 16 years) with paroxysmal or persistent AF who underwent catheter ablation guided by NCM. Noncontact and contact unipolar Egs were recorded simultaneously. The cross-correlation of the Eg morphology, activation time difference of the time-domain signals, and resultant frequency spectra were compared via dominant frequency (DF) and magnitude-squared coherence (MSC). RESULTS: A total of 159 sites were analyzed during AF. The variables that independently predicted a higher correlation between the contact and noncontact electrogram morphology were a smaller activation timing difference P < 0.01), smaller distance of the mapping sites to the array center (P = 0.01), and higher atrial voltage (P = 0.03). However, the average MSC of the frequency band within the physiologic range of AF (2 to 15 Hz) was only affected by the activation timing difference (P = 0.002). The DF value between the contact and noncontact unipolar signals correlated well with each other throughout the right atria and left atria in 94% of the mapping sites (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the noncontact unipolar Eg morphology decreased when the mapping sites harbored a smaller atrial voltage and longer distance to the array center. The DF difference between the contact and noncontact unipolar Eg was not affected by the distance to the array center.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (n=12). Noncontact unipolar electrograms vs. Contact unipolar electrograms was evaluated on Correlation of dominant frequency (DF) values between contact and noncontact unipolar signals (r = 0.87, p=<0.001). Dominant frequency values from noncontact unipolar electrograms correlated well with contact unipolar signals throughout the atria in 94% of mapping sites (r = 0.87, P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: