Introduction: Guidelines support early mobilization in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). In our 75-bed PICU, we implemented “PICU Move!,” a standardized early mobilization protocol using “Critical Care Illness Levels” (CCILs) that specify mobilization goals based on patients’ medical status. Methods: We used systems-based interventions (electronic health record order sets and workflows, opt-out therapy consultations, and progressive mobilization equipment) and person-based interventions (education, mobility champions, simulations, and mobility rounds). Process measures were CCIL ordering compliance, early mobilization goal compliance, and the proportion of admissions with a length of stay (LOS) ≥ 72 hours that included consultations with physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT). Outcome measures included time to first registered nurse activity documentation (all admissions and admissions with LOS ≥72 h) and admissions with LOS ≥72 hours with multiple PT/OT contacts. Balancing measures included safety event reports related to early mobilization activities, unplanned extubations, and falls. Results: During the intervention period (July 2023–December 2024), median monthly CCIL compliance was 95.9%, and early mobilization goal compliance was 49.4%. Compared to baseline, the average monthly proportion of admissions with LOS ≥72 hours with PT or OT consultation increased from 38.8% to 82.6% and from 34.3% to 81.2%, respectively. Multiple PT and OT contacts increased from 40.9% to 81.7% and from 37.7% to 70.8%, respectively. Time to first activity decreased from 21.6 to 19.6 hours (all admissions) and from 67.9 to 59.1 hours (admissions with LOS ≥72 h). There were no documented safety events related to early mobilization activities. Conclusions: In a large PICU, systems-based interventions, supplemented by person-based interventions, safely reduced time to first activity and increased the number of repeated PT/OT contacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zedalis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: