Key result
Labetalol produced significant falls in blood pressure (P<0.001) and better daily blood pressure control compared to methyldopa in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Why the study?
Does labetalol improve blood pressure control compared to methyldopa in pregnant patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension?
Observational (n=19)
Does labetalol improve blood pressure control compared to methyldopa in pregnant patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension?
p-value: p=<0.001
Labetalol provides superior blood pressure control with a more favorable maternal side-effect profile compared to methyldopa in pregnancy-induced hypertension.
May support labetalol preference in pregnant hypertension; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
1 Nineteen pregnant patients whose mean arterial pressure (MAP) was persistently greater than or equal to 103.3 mmHg were given labetalol or methyldopa. 2 Singificant falls (P less than 0.001) in BP only occurred in the group treated with labetalol, and daily BP control was better in this group. 3 Two severely hypertensive patients were successfully treated with intravenous labetalol. 4 There was a higher incidence of spontaneous labour in the labetalol group and a significant difference (P less than 0.05) in the Bishop score of the cervix between the two groups. 5 There were no apparent detrimental effects on the foetus antenatally, during labour or post partum. 6 Slight breathlessness in one patient treated with labetalol was the only side-effect observed but drowsiness, headache and postural hypotension were reported in patients receiving methyldopa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamming et al. (1979) conducted an observational in Pregnancy-induced hypertension (n=19). Labetalol vs. Methyldopa was evaluated on Fall in blood pressure (p=<0.001). Labetalol produced significant falls in blood pressure (P<0.001) and better daily blood pressure control compared to methyldopa in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: