Key result
A QTc interval of ≥430 ms was associated with decreased survival compared with a shorter QTc interval in 75-year-old individuals (RR 2.4; 95% CI 1.5-3.7).
Why the study?
Does a QTc interval ≥ 430 ms predict decreased survival in 75-year-old individuals from the general population?
Cohort (n=433)
Does a QTc interval ≥ 430 ms predict decreased survival in 75-year-old individuals from the general population?
Relative Risk: 2.4 (95% CI 1.5–3.7)
A computer-derived QTc interval ≥ 430 ms on a standard 12-lead ECG is a strong predictor of decreased survival and correlates with markers of cardiac dysfunction in 75-year-old individuals.
QTc prolongation was associated with poorer survival in 75-year-olds; leaves open incremental prognostic value beyond BNP and echocardiography.
AIMS: The study concerns the relationship of the corrected QT (QTc) interval to 6.4 years of survival and to measures of cardiac function, such as echocardiographic variables and plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), in 75-year-old people. METHODS AND RESULTS: QTc was measured in a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in 210 men and 223 women, comprising a randomly selected sample from the general population (70% participation rate). The Sicard 440/740 computer-analysis program, with Hodges' formula for heart rate-based QT correction, was used. The optimal cut-off point for predicting survival according to the receiver operating characteristic curve was found between 429 and 430 ms. Individuals with a QTc interval of > or =430 ms (n = 115) had decreased survival when compared with those with shorter QTc interval (n = 318); the relative risk was 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.5-3.7). The predictive ability of QTc reflects an association between QTc and the following variables: BNP, left ventricular mass, and left ventricular ejection fraction (but not diastolic filling patterns). Both Hodges' and Bazett's formulae for heart rate correction of the QT interval were useful for predicting survival. The median QTc was 415 ms using Hodges' formula and 430 ms with Bazett's formula. The QRS component of QTc predicted survival better than the rest of the QTc interval and was approximately as useful as the QTc interval itself. CONCLUSION: The computer-derived QTc obtained from the ordinary 12-lead ECG identifies high-risk individuals among elderly people from the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilsson et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in General population (n=433). QTc interval ≥430 ms vs. QTc interval <430 ms was evaluated on Survival (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.7). A QTc interval of ≥430 ms was associated with decreased survival compared with a shorter QTc interval in 75-year-old individuals (RR 2.4; 95% CI 1.5-3.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: