Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A procedure has been developed for deconvoluting line-of-sight average measurements of droplet-size distribution and optical extinction into the actual radial variations of droplet-size distribution and droplet number density in axisymmetric sprays. Preconditioning the line-of-sight average data via spline smoothing was shown to be necessary to prevent a complete loss of accuracy in the central region of the spray. After preconditioning, uncertainties in the average data propagated about 1:1 into the deconvoluted results. Cumulative truncation errors for a worst-case analysis approached 15% in the central region of the spray. A sample analysis for a typical hollow-cone spray is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dean C. Hammond (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: