Retrospective analysis evaluates the safety and effectiveness of two-port VATS in pediatric empyema, suggesting its advantages over traditional methods.
Background: Empyema thoracis is a serious pleural infection in children, most often arising as a complication of bacterial pneumonia. It contributes significantly to morbidity and, if inadequately treated, may result in irreversible pulmonary damage. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become a preferred minimally invasive approach for advanced empyema. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the two-port VATS technique in pediatric empyema thoracis, focusing on operative outcomes, complications, and recovery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted over 2 years, including 50 pediatric patients aged 1 month to 15 years with stage II/III empyema that was unresponsive to medical therapy. All underwent two-port VATS for decortication and lung re-expansion. Data on operative time, hospital stay, complications, and conversion to thoracotomy were analyzed. Results: Two-port VATS achieved satisfactory lung re-expansion and effective decortication in the majority of cases. The mean operative time was 75 min, and the average post-operative hospital stay was 12 days. Complications were minimal: One minor air leak and two cases requiring prolonged drainage. Four patients with chronic empyema required conversion to open thoracotomy. Overall morbidity was low, and cosmetic outcomes were favorable. Conclusion: Two-port VATS is a safe and effective modality for managing pediatric empyema thoracis. Compared to traditional thoracotomy, it offers reduced morbidity, shorter recovery, and superior cosmetic results. It should be considered a preferred surgical option in children with advanced empyema not responding to medical therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subudhi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: