Randomized trial evaluates interventions improving physical and psychological well-being in malignancy patients, suggesting enhanced rehabilitation potential.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with malignancy often have a poor prognosis and dismal quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate whether a combined nutrition, exercise, and psychological intervention could improve these outcomes. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: In an open-label, randomized controlled trial at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Oct 2021-Jun 2022), 90 patients were assigned (1:1) to a treatment group receiving 6-month cyclic combined assessments and interventions, or a control group receiving assessments only. Body composition, hand grip strength (HGS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and quality of life were compared at baseline and 6 months. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0, with p <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: 90 people were enrolled, and 80 people have completed the study. Compared to controls, the intervention group showed significantly lower nutritional risk (10.0 % vs. 100 %, p <0.001) and malnutrition rates (22.5 % vs. 100 %, p <0.001). Significant improvements were observed in BMI, muscle mass, phase angle, HGS, and 6MWT distance (all p <0.001). HADS and PHQ-9 scores decreased (p <0.001). Quality-of-life scores (physical, role, emotional, social function, overall health) improved, while symptom scores (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, etc.) decreased markedly (p <0.05). The control group exhibited opposite trends. CONCLUSIONS: Combined nutrition, exercise, and psychological interventions effectively improve nutritional status, physical and psychological well-being, and quality of life in patients with malignancy, potentially enhancing treatment tolerance and promoting rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: