Assesses leakage risk in fossil-based e-fuels under climate policies, suggesting a need for harmonized global frameworks.
Electrofuels (e-fuels) produced from captured CO 2 and hydrogen are expected to replace fossil fuels in hard-to-abate sectors. However, when the carbon originates from fossil-based sources, international trade of these fuels risks transferring CO 2 emissions across borders in the form of carbon leakage that undermines the climate goals. This study employed a global techno-economic energy system model to assess the leakage risk under various climate policy scenarios. The results indicate that approximately 0.5 Gt CO 2 , accounting for 17% of OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) country emissions by 2050, can be transferred to non-OECD through fossil-based e-fuels under heterogeneous climate policies. Including the carbon footprint of e-fuels in consumer-side emission accounting with effective carbon pricing largely eliminates this leakage and instead promotes carbon-neutral e-fuels. Harmonized global climate policies are similarly effective. These findings underscore the importance of a well-defined policy framework, such as carbon border adjustments for e-fuel trade, similar to those in place for hydrogen in the European Union.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ken Oshiro (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: