This review evaluates porous silicon's formation methods and applications, highlighting its potential in various advanced technologies.
Porous silicon (PSi) stands as a cornerstone nanomaterial in silicon-based technologies, uniquely combining tunable morphology, CMOS compatibility, and a large specific surface area. This review provides a comprehensive critical analysis of the three principal formation routes—stain etching (SE), metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE), and electrochemical anodic etching—with emphasis on controlled morphological engineering. Experimental results on SE reveal a cyclic growth-and-dissolution behaviour that enables through-wafer etching without external current sources. The defect-deformation (DD) mechanism is presented as a unifying framework that explains spontaneous pore ordering, including quasi-hexagonal arrangements and crystallographically driven transitions between sponge-like and columnar architectures. The application landscape is surveyed across multiple domains: VLSI lateral isolation, one-, two- and three-dimensional photonic crystals, parabolic X-ray lenses, betavoltaic converters, micro fuel cells (μ-FC), and biosensing platforms. Particular attention is paid to composite structures. Platinum-based core-shell catalysts (Pt@Au/PSi) ensure stable μ-FC operation exceeding 600 h. Proton-conducting membranes based on polyvinyl alcohol and phenolsulfonic acid (PVA:PSA) infiltrated into gradient porous silicon (GPSi) matrices achieve record conductivities (0.33 S cm⁻¹ at high humidity), rivalling Nafion®. Carbon nanofibre and graphene-like films deposited inside macropores reduce surface resistance by two to three orders of magnitude and increase specific surface area by a factor up to 3.4. Beyond performance, this review addresses long-term stability and degradation mechanisms—including hydrolysis, structural fatigue, and biofouling—and evaluates passivation strategies (oxidation, hydrosilylation, carbonization, ALD). GPSi-var membranes exhibit anti-reflection coefficients below 0.11%, while nanoporous silicon proves biocompatible, promoting cell proliferation, thereby opening perspectives for biomedical and neuromorphic interfaces. A comparative assessment with emerging materials (graphene, MXenes, MOFs, silicon photonic platforms) highlights PSi’s unique advantages: CMOS integrability, biodegradability, and well-established surface chemistry. Finally, the review critically examines the technological readiness level (TRL) of PSi devices and the remaining challenges for large-scale manufacturing, including substrate inhomogeneities, scale-up of electrochemical etching, and integration with CMOS flows. The results underscore the potential of porous silicon-based composites for next-generation energy, photonic, sensing, and bio-integrated devices, while identifying the key research directions needed to accelerate their commercial deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Starkov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: