Assesses PM0.49 characteristics and sources in a rural area, suggesting significant air quality implications.
Air pollution, particularly biomass burning (BB)–derived particulate matter (PM), remains a major challenge in Southeast Asia, affecting atmospheric processes, climate, human health, and socio-economic systems. This study presents the chemical characterization and source contributions of PM 0.49 at a rural site along the Thailand–Myanmar border in 2023. PM 0.49 concentrations showed pronounced temporal variability, with smoke-haze (SH) concentrations (67.9 ± 46.0 µg/m 3 ) nearly six times higher than those during non-haze periods (non-SH; 10.9 ± 4.4 µg/m 3 ). Organic carbon (OC) dominated during SH, accounting for 46% of PM 0.49 mass, followed by secondary inorganic aerosols (SO 4 2− , NO 3 − , NH 4 + ; 13%) and BB tracers such as K + (1.4%) and levoglucosan (2.7%), indicating strong BB influence. K⁺ exhibited strong correlations with levoglucosan ( r = 0.95) and major anions ( r = 0.52–0.94), highlighting its dual role as both a neutralizing cation and a BB tracer in both fresh and aged BB aerosols. Elevated OC to elemental carbon ratios (OC/EC; 13.4 ± 4.6) and char-EC/soot-EC ratios (9.68 ± 4.82) indicate smoldering BB as the principal source. Positive matrix factorization attributed 57% of PM 0.49 to BB during SH (up to 69% during peak phase), whereas soil dust dominated during non-SH conditions (70%). Backward trajectories and fire hotspot analyses suggest substantial cross-border transport from Myanmar. Furthermore, the seasonal shift in the effective carbon ratio (ECR), from 0.63 (SH) to 1.13 (non-SH), indicates a transition from light-absorbing to light-scattering aerosol dominance, underscoring the role of PM 0.49 in aerosol transformation under BB influence. These findings suggest air quality and potential climate implications, supporting coordinated mitigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: