This piece discusses the impact of federal policies on gender expansiveness, revealing structural conditions for trans lives.
A renewed urgency to understand and theorize the production of trans “illegality” on a national scale came into clear focus in the first months of 2025, as the Trump administration ushered in a federal agenda mandating transphobia as top priority. Tacked onto the forty‐seventh administration's sweeping plans to ideologically and ethnically cleanse the country under the banner of “America First”, there is renewed impetus to eradicate traces of gender expansiveness from public life as a matter of law, beginning with bureaucratic enforcement of the erroneous “biological truth” of binary sex. Drawing on experiences conducting field research in Texas, this piece revisits the limits of documentation and legal legibility from the perspective of a migrant trans anthropologist forced to confront the where legal possibilities end and socio‐political realities begin. While simultaneously forging method against the state, the piece argues that illegality, more than metaphor, is a matter of legal production, or the codifying of exclusion, a structural condition that requires upkeep through bureaucratic and police power and is currently being renegotiated to capture trans subjecthood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xitlalli Alvarez Almendariz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: