Evaluates gross primary production estimation in diverse landscapes, suggesting improved accuracy via spatial context analysis.
Accurate estimation of gross primary production (GPP) is fundamental for quantifying the terrestrial carbon cycle. However, coarse-resolution products often fail to capture fine-scale spatial variations in carbon uptake across heterogeneous landscapes. While recent studies have begun to employ 10m Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery, they typically reduce these data to pixel-wise spectral indices, discarding the two-dimensional spatial structure (canopy architecture, land-cover transitions, within-stand heterogeneity) that the imagery encodes. This study investigates whether explicitly exploiting this spatial context via convolutional neural networks yields robust, transferable gains over tabular machine-learning baselines. We curate a quality-controlled dataset of 23,528 eight-day multi-sensor composites from 222 AmeriFlux sites (2015–2025), evaluated under site-wise cross-validation, temporal generalisation, and geographic transfer to an 18-site upper Midwest forest holdout. Under temporal transfer to unseen years (2023–2025), the best convolutional model achieves R2 = 0.77 and RMSE = 1.95 gCm−2 d−1, an 18.6% RMSE reduction over ridge regression (R2 = 0.65, RMSE = 2.40 gCm−2 d−1). Although this advantage narrows under geographic transfer to structurally novel regions (R2 = 0.59 vs. 0.54), the convolutional models still outperform all tabular baselines. Spatial structure at 10m therefore supports more robust temporal generalisation than spectral aggregates alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: