Systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate glyphosate and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk, suggesting a significant association with high exposure.
Glyphosate-based herbicides are widely used agricultural chemicals. Concerns regarding carcinogenicity, particularly non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), persist. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better evaluate glyphosate exposure and NHL risk. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for eligible cohort, case–control, and pooled studies. Risk of bias was assessed using recommended criteria. Random- and fixed-effects meta-analyses were performed, with sensitivity analyses addressing overlapping cohorts, hazard ratio inclusion, exposure definitions, and model overfitting. Evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Ten primary datasets were analyzed. Ever-exposure was associated with an odds ratio of 1.11. Highest-exposure analyses demonstrated a significant association with NHL. Ever-exposure associations were modest, whereas a higher glyphosate exposure was consistently associated with an increased NHL risk. The findings were robust across sensitivity analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gagnier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: