Review examines structural aspects and performance of bio-based materials, indicating potential for sustainable construction.
The global construction industry is increasingly seeking sustainable alternatives to conventional structural materials to reduce environmental impacts and support circular economy goals. This review examines bio-based construction materials from a structural engineering perspective, focusing on the transition from intrinsic material properties to member-level behavior and system-scale applications. A combined bibliometric and “From Material to Member” framework is used to connect microstructural characteristics with structural performance across scales. The review covers microbial self-healing concretes, engineered bamboo, plant-aggregate concretes such as hempcrete and rice-husk composites, lignin-based polymers and resins, and mycelium composites, with emphasis on materials and systems relevant to structural and member-scale applications. Bio-based materials developed primarily for asphalt and pavement applications are outside the scope of this review. Mechanical, thermal, durability, and environmental performance are evaluated alongside emerging multi-scale modeling approaches and hybrid structural systems. The findings show that bio-concretes can provide autonomous crack repair, engineered bamboo offers high strength-to-weight efficiency, and lignin-based polymers enable renewable composite matrices with adaptable properties. However, challenges remain regarding connection design, moisture sensitivity, long-term durability, standardization, and the transfer of laboratory findings to structural-scale reliability. Life-cycle assessment studies indicate substantial embodied carbon reduction potential, although outcomes depend on processing methods, service-life assumptions, and end-of-life scenarios. Overall, performance-based design, durability assessment, standardized testing, and dynamic life-cycle approaches are essential for broader structural implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Einafshar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: