Exact reduction and machine-verifiable bounds optimize entanglement fidelity in quantum encoding, suggesting new methodologies.
We study the canonical USp(4)-covariant quantum compression problem in which the fifteen-dimensional carrier W = V5 ⊕ V10 is encoded through a four-dimensional covariant memory M = V4 and decoded, and we ask for the optimal entanglement fidelity F*(p) of the composite channel on a trace-one, sector-weighted reference state ρ_p. This problem is the operational face of a structural fact: the same pair of sectors 5 ⊕ 10 that makes USp(4) on C^4 state-homogeneous but not observable-uniform is exactly the modal content a minimal covariant memory is asked to carry. Our contribution is not a resolution of the underlying capacity question but a demonstration that this problem admits an exact reduction and a machine-checkable global bound: the reduction and the final lower- and upper-bound certificates are exact, while only the intermediate relaxation-solving step is numerical. We give an exact representation-theoretic reduction — Wedderburn splitting of the covariant commutant over Q(i), an induced-involution positivity bridge, and an exact trace-preservation reduction to fifteen free rational coordinates — turning F*(p) into a bilinear polynomial optimization over a product of two explicit semialgebraic bodies, each the affine preimage of the product cone (R+ × SOC4 × SOC4). Exploiting correlative sparsity we build an order-two sum-of-squares relaxation, solve it numerically for discovery, reconstruct the resulting SOS upper bounds in exact rational arithmetic, and separately certify exact rational feasible lower bounds from explicit witnesses. At p = 1/2 and p = 7/8: 0.0749 ≤ F*(1/2) ≤ 0.21, and 0.1546 ≤ F*(7/8) ≤ 0.643 (exact rationals in the paper). The upper bounds are Positivstellensatz certificates whose polynomial identity and positive semidefiniteness are verified with no optimizer in the loop by a standalone verifier we provide. Throughout we keep three visibly separate registers — exact theorems, numerical diagnostics, and open or conditional interpretations — and we are explicit that the exact optimum, the exactness of the relaxation, and the width of the certified interval remain open. Package: this record includes the manuscript, a single 30-page combined archival PDF (cover + manuscript + auditable reduction-supplement listing) inside the package, and a verification package with two independent machine-checkable obligations (the exact reduction chain and the certified two-sided enclosure). Manuscript licensed CC BY 4.0; code licensed MIT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dustin Ogle (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: