Evaluates the relationship between sieving coefficients and pore structures in hemodiafiltration membranes, indicating a new methodology for assessing membrane performance.
The novel lab-scale hollow fiber membrane module was fabricated to determine the apparent sieving coefficient ( SCobs ) of commercial hemodiafiltration membranes, MFX-SW eco (polyethersulfone, Sample A) and NVF-P (polysulfone, Sample B), using the aqueous solution of dextran with a broader molecular weight distribution. All the molecular weight cut-off curves plotted as SCobs versus filtration flow rate ( Q F ) exhibited smooth profiles without intersecting each other, showing distinct variations depending on Q F across a wide range of molecular weights. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) observations revealed that the equivalent pore diameters of samples A and B were nearly identical at 23.0 ± 15.5 nm and 23.3 ± 15.5 nm, respectively. Although the surface porosity of sample A (14.5 ± 3.9%) was higher than that of sample B (10.2 ± 3.2%), the difference was not statistically significant. These numerical data were in excellent agreement with the qualitative morphological findings obtained from the FE-SEM images. Furthermore, it is suggested that the subtle structural differences between the two membranes are also reflected in the relationship between the real sieving coefficients ( SCᵣₑₐₗ ) calculated by using SCobs and the equivalent pore diameters. Since the lab-scale modules are fabricated relatively easily by hand, this methodology is extremely valuable to rigorously define membrane performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ichikawa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: