Evaluates porosity in coal-rock gas reservoirs, indicating advancements in logging techniques.
With the gradual decline in conventional oil and gas production growth, unconventional natural gas has become a strategic alternative for hydrocarbon supply. Coal-rock gas (CRG) represents a deep unconventional gas resource with huge potential. Major exploration breakthroughs of CRG have been achieved in China, while systematic research targeting CRG as an independent gas reservoir is still lacking internationally. After effective commercial development, CRG serves as an important supplementary energy source for the domestic natural gas supply. Existing logging evaluation methods exhibit notable deficiencies, as porosity is typically estimated by fitting well logging data or proximate analysis data, resulting in limited accuracy. To address the lack of a dedicated logging volumetric model, ambiguous coal-matrix framework parameters, and substantial porosity calculation errors in deep CRG reservoirs, this study investigates the medium–high rank No. 8 coal seam of the Benxi Formation in the central-eastern Ordos Basin. From an oil and gas reservoir logging evaluation perspective, multi-scale experiments were conducted to systematically characterize the material composition and microscopic characteristics of the coal rock. From the perspective of oil and gas reservoir logging evaluation, a three-component logging volumetric model, consisting of a coal matrix, inorganic minerals, and pore fluids, was constructed, and the corresponding coal-matrix framework parameters were calibrated. The results demonstrate that coal rock is an organic–inorganic composite system, with organic macerals dominated by vitrinite (averaging 59.1%) and inertinite (27.1%). The sum of fixed carbon and volatiles exhibits strong correlations with total organic carbon (TOC) and micro-CT-derived coal-matrix content, yielding determination coefficients of 0.99 and 0.95, respectively, which validates the reliability of the multi-scale quantitative composition characterization. The coal-matrix framework parameters are non-constant: density ranges from 1.08 to 1.56 g·cm−3, acoustic slowness from 281 to 425 μs·m−1, and compensated neutron from 39% to 79%. Borehole enlargement severely affects compensated density and neutron logs but has negligible interference with acoustic slowness. Notably, inertinite content shows a significant negative correlation with the acoustic-slowness framework response (R2 = 0.80), indicating that structurally dense inertinite is a key intrinsic factor controlling the elastic response of the coal matrix. For porosity evaluation, a dual-variable framework model is proposed. The core novelty of this method is that it simultaneously incorporates variations in inorganic mineral content and differences in inertinite proportion within organic components as dynamic framework constraints, breaking through the limitation of the conventional constant-matrix assumption. The acoustic-slowness-based model achieves an average relative error of merely 7.1%, effectively resolving the large errors inherent in conventional fitting methods. The dedicated coal-rock logging evaluation system established in this study overcomes the limitations of fixed framework models, offers a scientific basis for fine-scale interpretation and resource assessment of deep CRG reservoirs, and provides a valuable reference for evaluating analogous reservoirs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: