Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review and meta-analysis report progression patterns in glioblastoma after chemoradiation and salvage therapy, suggesting need for standardized reporting.
PURPOSE: Spatial patterns of glioblastoma (GBM) progression inform focal salvage eligibility, but interpretation across studies is limited by heterogeneous spatial definitions, high between-study heterogeneity, and incomplete reporting of non-enhancing/FLAIR-dominant progression. We synthesized reported progression-location involvement after upfront radiotherapy/temozolomide (RT/TMZ) and salvage therapy. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and Scopus from January 1, 2000, to February 1, 2026, and performed arm-level random-effects meta-analysis of logit-transformed proportions. Enhancing progression was harmonized as non-mutually exclusive local/in-field, marginal/field-edge, and distant/out-of-field involvement among evaluable cases, using each study's spatial framework. The supplementary broad escape-pattern construct was defined as reported progression beyond purely local/in-field enhancing failure. RESULTS: We included 107 studies (122 arms; 10,529 patients). At first progression after upfront RT/TMZ ± TTF, reported local/in-field enhancing involvement among evaluable cases was 79.2% (95% CI 75.7-82.3; k = 94; n = 6,989; I²=84.8%), and distant/out-of-field involvement was 16.9% (95% CI 14.3-19.9; k = 89; n = 6,493; I²=85.2%). After salvage therapy, local/in-field involvement remained the majority pattern reported among evaluable cases (59.8%, 95% CI 52.8-66.4; k = 27; n = 1,572; I²=80.5%), with distant/out-of-field involvement of 17.5% (95% CI 12.9-23.3; k = 21; n = 1,307; I²=75.5%) and a supplementary broad escape-pattern estimate of 38.6% (95% CI 31.9-45.9; k = 27; n = 1,572; I²=80.1%). Non-enhancing/FLAIR-dominant progression was sparsely and likely selectively reported; only six recurrent/salvage arms contributed data, yielding an exploratory pooled estimate of 27.8% (95% CI 12.8-50.3; n = 216; I²=75.7%). CONCLUSION: Published GBM cohorts show predominantly local/in-field enhancing progression after upfront therapy (~ 80%) and persistent majority local/in-field involvement after salvage therapy (~ 60%). Standardized reporting of enhancing, non-enhancing/FLAIR-dominant, disseminated, posterior fossa, and brainstem progression is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chojak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: