Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows enhanced viral clearance in Drosophila S2 cells using RNA interference, suggesting new recovery approaches.
Background: The RNA interference (RNAi) pathway is a highly conserved antiviral mechanism in eukaryotes, including insects such as fruit flies. Many viruses have therefore evolved mechanisms that protect their transcripts and/or genomes; how effectively RNAi can act is thus a question that must be answered case-by-case. Methods: We demonstrate that the RNAi machinery can successfully combat Drosophila A virus (DAV) in persistently infected Drosophila melanogaster S2 cell lines, but only when supported with exogenous triggers. Since such an infection poses a challenge to the fitness of cells and the reproducibility of results obtained with them, our approach provides a convenient method to recover precious experimentally modified cell lines from infection through the application of exogenous double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) targeting the DAV sequence. The in vitro transcribed dsRNAs were applied to infected S2 cells via direct “soaking,” utilizing the cells’ natural endocytic uptake. Results: We monitored treatment efficacy via RT-PCR-based detection of viral sequences, and our results demonstrate that continued application of DAV-specific dsRNAs led to a reduction in viral abundance and all eight tested cell lines appeared DAV-negative within several weeks of treatment. While a set of cell lines exhibited viral recurrence several weeks after the cessation of treatment, others remained virus-free for at least 16 weeks, suggesting that a permanent “cure” can indeed be achieved. Notably, while RNAi activation effectively cleared DAV in some cell lines, no beneficial effect was observed for a concomitantly applied Drosophila X-virus (DXV) treatment in the co-infected cultures. Conclusions: This suggests that DXV has more efficient evasion mechanisms but cannot protect DAV in trans. Our protocol thus provides a robust, scalable approach for clearing persistent DAV infections, but may not be effective against all viruses known to infect Drosophila cell cultures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kochendörfer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: