Why the study?
Does the sectioning method (short-axis vs long-axis) of deep excisional skin biopsy affect the detection rate of wild-type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis?
Comparison
Short-axis sections with vertical cuts vs long-axis sections with a horizontal cut
Key result
Deep excisional skin biopsy including abdominal fat detected wild-type ATTR in 83% of short-axis sections compared to 54% of long-axis sections.
Authors
Loading...
Short-axis sectioning may enhance cardiac wtATTR detection; leaves open standardized protocols for clinical biopsies.
Observational
Does the sectioning method (short-axis vs long-axis) of deep excisional skin biopsy affect the detection rate of wild-type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 83% vs 54%
Short-axis sections of deep excisional skin biopsies including abdominal fat yield a higher detection rate (83%) for wild-type ATTR compared to long-axis sections (54%).
Honda et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Deep excisional skin biopsy (short-axis sections) vs. Deep excisional skin biopsy (long-axis sections) was evaluated on Detection rate for wild-type ATTR. Deep excisional skin biopsy including abdominal fat detected wild-type ATTR in 83% of short-axis sections compared to 54% of long-axis sections.