Validates a screening tool for early math difficulties in children, indicating its effectiveness in diverse socio-economic settings.
This article presents two complementary studies examining the technical adequacy and utility of PREMAT, a CBM tool designed for screening early math difficulties in first-grade Chilean children. Study 1 evaluates reliability, predictive validity, and the factorial structure of PREMAT across three time points, as well as measurement invariance by sex and socioeconomic status (SES). Study 2 focuses on classification accuracy using ROC curve analysis. A total of 567 children (415 no-risk, 152 at-risk) from low-, middle-, and high-SES backgrounds completed five PREMAT tasks, including two underexamined screeners: Arithmetic Facts and Number Line. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a one-factor model, and partial scalar invariance was established across time, sex, and SES. Latent means revealed consistent performance gaps favoring boys and high-SES students. ROC analyses showed acceptable to excellent accuracy (AUC = .75–.89), with composite scores outperforming single tasks. Together, the findings support PREMAT as a valid and reliable screening tool for use in underrepresented educational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: