Randomized trial evaluates food challenges for diagnosing food allergies, suggesting effective clinical practice.
Food challenges play an important role in the diagnosis and management of food hypersensitivity. Although the gold-standard is the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, an open challenge, where the challenge food is known to both the patient and the allergy team, is a practical and effective tool for use in daily clinical practice. A food challenge can help determine the presence or absence of a food allergy if the history and allergy tests are discordant, or if resolution of the allergy is expected. The outcome of a food challenge can result in either confident introduction or re-introduction of foods or provide clarity on which foods or forms of the food need to be avoided. Challenges can be a positive or negative experience for individuals; to maximise the potential for positive impact, food challenges should be overseen by individuals with relevant knowledge, skills and experience, and take place in a suitable clinical area with appropriate access to emergency support and a pathway for admission to an inpatient facility. Challenge foods should be age-specific, in an appropriate form (uncooked, cooked, baked, composite food), and given in incrementally increasing amounts until an age-specific top or cumulative dose has been consumed. The decision to pause or stop a challenge should be based on international guidance and clinician judgement, but also consider an individual's symptom history and their preferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skypala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: