Randomized trial improves 3D semantic mapping in underground robotics, suggesting effective perception in challenging conditions.
Purpose Underground inspection robots need reliable semantic perception in narrow, low-texture and unevenly illuminated spaces. This study aims to improve RGB-D semantic mapping for underground robotic inspection by generating more stable semantic labels and more coherent 3D semantic maps. Design/methodology/approach An attention-enhanced and boundary-refined DeepLabv3+ network is used as the semantic front end. A multi-head self-attention module is introduced to strengthen global contextual modeling in degraded regions, and a boundary-enhanced conditional random field is used to refine object contours. The pixel-level semantic labels are then projected into RGB-D point clouds through back-projection, multi-frame semantic fusion and semantic-geometric optimization. The method is evaluated on data collected by a wheeled-legged inspection robot equipped with a RealSense D455 camera in a simulated underground tunnel. Findings The proposed method improves mean intersection over union (mIoU) from 73.7% to 78.2% and mean pixel accuracy (mPA) from 86.5% to 92.1%. The 3D semantic mapping results remain relatively coherent under normal, high-illumination and low-illumination conditions. The mapping time increases after semantic fusion but remains within an acceptable range for offline inspection-map construction. Practical implications The method provides a semantic mapping solution for robotic inspection in underground spaces where visual degradation affects scene understanding, target localization and subsequent equipment inspection. Originality/value This study combines global semantic enhancement, boundary-aware refinement and RGB-D semantic projection in an underground robotic inspection framework. It links front-end semantic perception with 3D map construction rather than evaluating image segmentation alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guanglei Liang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: