Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Article reanalyzes particle physics foundations using a cubic lattice model, highlighting new insights into mass and charge.
This article reanalyzes the foundations of particle physics from experimental and observational facts, through a methodology that rethinks the hierarchy of evidence and places observational invariants above formalism. The analysis converges on a single structure: space at the particle scale is a three-dimensional cubic lattice, of which particles, photons, and all physical phenomena are deformations transmitted as discrete waves. Charge duality arises from the vacancy/excess duality of lattice nodes and is identified as the real matter/antimatter symmetry; mass arises from the geometric configuration of the lattice around the charge. A new fundamental quantity ξ = mec2 = 0.511 MeV sets the energy scale of the lattice, whose spacing is the reduced Compton wavelength ƛC. The three-dimensional structure of the proton is identified, yielding a purely geometric derivation of the fine-structure constant, 1/α = 82 + 82 + 32 × (1 + ζ3) = 137.036121592 with ζ = √3/2 − 1/√2, and of the proton mass, mproton = 3 × (1/α + 1 + ζ2 × 1372) × ξ = 938.272087 MeV. Charge alternation emerges as the single mechanism behind atomic, molecular, and nuclear binding: the electron loses its orbitals, the neutron reverts to a proton–electron pair, the deuteron becomes a p+e−e+e−p+ chain, and nucleosynthesis is reread as sequences of exothermic reactions. Relativity is reread within a latticed frame clocked at c, and the Higgs mechanism is rejected. This work has been submitted for peer review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olivier Bourhy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: